Foundational Black Americans: Lodisucio, The Anti-Latino, and Anti-Mixed-race, Black Americans

In segments of Latino social media on TikTok, X, and similar platforms, the term “Lodisucio” — drawn from Spanish “lodo sucio,” or dirty mud, referring to one's mind — has surfaced as a descriptive label for a perceived element within Foundational Black American (FBA) circles. Critics, primarily Latino commentators, use it to describe rhetoric they view as Black supremacist: claims of exclusive indigeneity, “we built America” exceptionalism, demands framed around native Black priority, and occasional anti-immigrant hostility even if they are considered of the same race. They argue this strain, paired with Democratic messaging seen as centering Black issues, contributes to Latino disillusionment and gradual movement away from the Democratic party.

The narrative frames Lodisucios as a growing internal problem that FBAs must confront, lest it fracture multicultural coalitions. Posts often tie it to specific clashes over identity, history, and resource allocation. Many Foundational Black Americans have exhibited extreme racial prejudice against mixed-race families which has exacerbated tensions with Latino communities.

Along with racialized rhetoric coming from prominent radical pro-Black politicians, broader evidence on Latino voter realignment in recent cycles points primarily to economic concerns, border security, inflation, education, and cultural priorities. The term functions more as a descriptor and an analytical category, spotlighting genuine frictions in diverse coalitions. Tensions over identity and politics exist across communities; attributing partisan shifts chiefly to any single “problem” faction oversimplifies documented trends.

Mississippi: The Premier Destination for Latino Families in Today's Economy – Affordable, Growing, and Ready for Hispano Contributions

In the economic landscape of 2026, characterized by ongoing inflation pressures and a competitive job market, Mississippi emerges as an exceptionally promising destination for Latino families and professionals. With a statewide population of approximately 2.95 million as of 2025, the Hispanic or Latino community now constitutes about 4.1 percent, equating to roughly 121,000 individuals. This demographic has demonstrated robust growth, increasing by more than 22,000 people between 2010 and 2022, with the share rising from 2.8 percent to 3.6 percent. Notably, coastal regions such as Harrison and Jackson counties have seen an addition of about 4,000 Hispanic residents since 2020, fostering vibrant, integrated communities in areas like Biloxi and Gulfport. These Misisipiano Latinos, as they are termed in Spanish, are contributing to a cultural enrichment that aligns with the state's evolving identity, infusing local economies with entrepreneurial energy and family-oriented values.

Economically, Mississippi offers substantial advantages that position it as prime for investment and upward mobility. The state has secured over $66 billion in private sector investments since 2020, creating more than 24,000 jobs, with a pipeline exceeding $90 billion in potential capital and 35,000 additional positions across 140 projects. Sectors like advanced manufacturing, data centers, and artificial intelligence are driving this surge; for instance, xAI's $20 billion facility in Southaven underscores Mississippi's readiness for high-tech growth. Latino workers, who excel in industries such as construction, agriculture, and seafood processing—where Hispanic representation has risen to 25.5 percent nationally and 6 percent in Mississippi's sector—stand to benefit significantly. Moreover, the state's gig economy is projected to expand rapidly, offering flexible opportunities that enhance earning potential and work-life balance.

For Latinos like those relocating from higher-cost areas such as Orlando, Florida, New York, New York, Los Angeles, California, Mississippi's cost of living—14 to 21 percent lower than Florida's and much lower to the others—translates to greater financial flexibility, enabling investments in homes, businesses, or education. This affordability, combined with family-sustaining wages in booming sectors, mitigates challenges faced by the Latino working class, including wage stagnation and access to benefits. The state's emphasis on workforce modernization, including portable benefits, further supports long-term stability.

Mississippi's trajectory invites Latino investment, not only in capital but in cultural "Hispano flare"—through businesses, festivals, and community initiatives that can transform local landscapes. As the fastest-growing demographic offsetting population declines, Misisipiano Latinos are poised to lead in entrepreneurship and innovation, building wealth in a state ripe for their contributions. For families seeking resilience amid economic uncertainty, Mississippi represents a strategic move toward prosperity and belonging.

Floridanismo: The Rise of Latino Catholic Conservatism and Florida First Politics Under Trump

After expanding my research into Católicophobia and Floridanophobia, I’ve observed an emerging trend among pro-Catholic Hispanic communities under Trump: a growing call for a “Florida First” political approach grounded in a distinct regional identity. It intent is to support a central Floridano identity.

The Latino conservative movement is rising rapidly in Florida. While it was once dominated largely by Cuban voices, the expanding presence of Puerto Rican, Peruvian, Colombian, and Dominican communities has added new layers of complexity to the political landscape. Within this diversity, however, a shared sense of purpose is beginning to take shape. Floridanismo is an effort to formalize and strengthen that unity.

Floridanismo advocates for a more unified Latino community as a means of achieving political change that expands Latino businesses and their economic opportunities throughout the state of Florida. This vision of unity also includes linguistic cohesion, with support for English, Latin, and Spanish as official languages of the state, reflecting practical communication needs as well as cultural continuity, including the development of a more Latin- and Spanish- influenced form of English. For example, changing Floridian to Floridano/Floridana.

Floridanismo supports expanded access to free or low-cost healthcare through a combination of public and private initiatives. It also calls for stronger regional trade, military cooperation, and political alignment among the southern United States, the Caribbean, and Latin America, emphasizing Florida’s role as a regional bridge.

Many supporters of Floridanismo emphasize the defense of the Catholic faith alongside Indigenous American religious traditions. They tend to favor socially conservative policies while supporting more economically liberal approaches, though with defined limits. This includes opposition to elective abortion and advocacy for high “sin taxes” on certain goods and services.

Advocates of Floridanismo generally view race as an inherently limiting framework and treat it as a secondary or descriptive detail rather than a defining political factor. When race is discussed, it often includes considerations of ethnicity and historical concepts such as the casta system. Within the movement, some supporters view “Latino” as a race, while others see it as an ethnicity; however, there is broad respect for the term as a clear and practical way to refer to the shared community.

Overall, Floridanismo is a response to longstanding social, political, and cultural pressures faced by Latino Catholics in Florida. It is not merely a call for electoral or policy change, but a broader movement oriented toward cultural cohesion, collective identity formation, and long-term communal advancement. Central to this vision is support for bilingual and trilingual communities, which are viewed as both practical tools for integration and symbols of cultural continuity.

Floridanismo calls for cultural expansion also includes structured cultural exchange with Japanese and Korean communities, framed as a means of fostering intercultural dialogue, strengthening social cohesion, and enriching the evolving Latino-Floridano cultural identity. Within this framework, the learning of additional languages—such as Japanese, Korean, and others—is not discouraged, but rather accepted as a complementary form of cultural engagement that broadens intellectual horizons while remaining rooted in a shared regional identity.

Latino Economic Rise: Wealth Gains, Crypto Leadership, and the Data Shift Under Trump's Immigration Plans

In recent years, the Latino community in the United States has made measurable economic progress, with gains in education, employment and income. According to a May 2024 Pew Research Center report, the share of Latinas with a college degree has nearly doubled since 2003. Their labor force participation rose from 64 percent in 2003 to 69 percent in 2023; meanwhile, median hourly wages increased by approximately 22 percent, from $15.83 to $19.23 in inflation-adjusted terms. These are encouraging signs of long-term socioeconomic mobility within the community.

Still, substantial wealth gaps persist. A December 2023 Pew analysis showed that Hispanic households had a median net worth of roughly $48,700, compared to $250,400 for White households. Though Hispanic households experienced a 42 percent increase in wealth between 2019 and 2021, they continue to trail behind in building personal assets.

Interestingly, Latino Americans are somewhat more likely to engage with cryptocurrencies than their White counterparts. Pew data indicates that about one‑in‑five Hispanic adults – approximately 20 percent – have invested in, traded or used cryptocurrencies, compared with just 13 percent of White adults. A 2021 Pew survey further confirms this demographically diverse adoption, showing Hispanic, Black, and Asian adults more likely than Whites to ever invest in crypto.

These trends suggest a community embracing alternative investment tools like crypto, possibly due to relatively younger age demographics and the appeal of decentralized financial systems. Yet broad distrust remains: as of October 2024, 63 percent of adults expressed little confidence in the safety or reliability of cryptocurrencies. Turning to policy, President Donald Trump’s second term brings renewed focus on immigration enforcement. While immigration is a contentious topic, stricter policies may indirectly enhance the fidelity of federal data regarding the Latino population. 

By clarifying legal status criteria in surveys and administrative records, the Census Bureau and American Community Survey could more accurately capture household composition, income and net worth. Improved survey framing—such as distinguishing between legal residents and undocumented individuals—can lead to more precise estimations of median household net worth within the Latino community. Accurate disaggregation, even if driven by stricter definitions, ensures clearer insight into gaps and growth that guide policy and resource allocation.

The economic story for Latinos is one of advancement: rising educational attainment, labor force engagement, wage growth—and growing foot traffic into cryptocurrencies. If immigration policy fosters clearer demographic definitions and more reliable data collection, policymakers will be better equipped to track progress and tailor interventions effectively.

Is Latinx a Slur? Is Latinx Offensive?

By Luis Albert Rosales

To activists, Latinx is a gender-neutral term intended to be an inclusive alternative to Latino or Latina. It is primarily used by academics and social activists. Supporters of the term argue that it helps represent individuals who feel marginalized or not fully included by the traditional term 'Latino.' However, the term has faced significant backlash from much of the Latino community as some Hispanic-focused organizations have adopted the term to refer to all Latinos. Many of those same organizations have returned to use Latino or Hispanic due to backlash. As a result, many Latinos have rejected its use. For Hispanos who have heard the term, many feel as if the word is insulting or a mockery of their Hispanic culture.

Latinx: Its Purpose and Public Perception

The term Latinx originated from progressive activists and gained popularity primarily within academic circles through its use by scholars in studies and research, rather than widespread adoption among the general Latino population. It is intended to be a gender-neutral alternative to traditional Spanish gendered terms like Latino (masculine) and Latina (feminine). In Spanish, gender markers are typically indicated by the endings -o for masculine and -a for feminine nouns. Latinx aims to include individuals who do not identify within the traditional gender binary, allegedly promoting greater inclusivity. Their position is that the term provides inclusive language for Latinos who identify as ‘non-binary’ or with similar identities. Some argue that it is a necessity to deconstruct the masculine default that, in their perspective, marginalizes women and “non-binary people”. Some proponents view language as a powerful tool for shaping social reality. By changing language, they believe they can promote more inclusive and equitable ways of thinking about gender and identity within Hispanic communities and beyond as language evolves.

This presents a complex dynamic between the scholars' intent to promote inclusivity and the term's reception within Latino and Hispanic culture. While the intention is to foster greater inclusivity, the term has also faced harsh criticism from many Hispanics who view it as an example of linguistic imposition, some have described it as “linguistic imperialism” or “linguistic colonialism”. Many Latinos have a negative view of the term. Some would highlight that, in Spanish, it makes no grammatical sense, and that it would be difficult to pronounce in Spanish. Others expand on that but also argue that if the concern is with the English language, there is no need for a new gender-neutral term since existing terms like “Latin American”, or simply ‘Latin’ or ‘Hispanic’, already serve as gender-neutral options to refer to Latino people or Hispanos. Ultimately, they affirm that Latinos who use the term may be disconnected from their Latino or Hispanics roots. Through this perspective, some view it as nothing more than an attempt at performative social justice with a strong misunderstanding of Latino culture. From a linguistic perspective, The Real Academia Española, which many view as the official arbiter on the Spanish language, has rejected Latinx and its use as a gender-neutral term for Latinos.

The Latinx Studies

Regarding the studies of Latinx and its use within the Latino community, Pew Research has conducted several studies on Latinx. In this section, we’re going to focus on Latinos who have heard of the term in a specific study from Pew Research titled “Latinx Awareness Has Doubled Among U.S. Hispanics Since 2019, but Only 4% Use It.” This study, with 5,078 adult Hispanics surveyed, was released in September 2024, but it was conducted in 2023.

According to the study, 53% of Latinos have not heard of the term. Of the 47% who have, only 4% use it to describe themselves. However, a supermajority of Latinos (75%) say that Latinx should not be used to describe the Hispanic or the Latino community. To add, 36% say that using the term more often is ‘bad’, while 38% are neutral in its use. Those who say that the term is good reflects only 12% of the Hispanic population while those who are unsure reflects 14%. It concludes that Latinos would more likely find the use of Latinx to be negative than positive.

When it comes to lesbian, gay or bisexual participants of this study, only 13% say they use Latinx to describe themselves. This group is the only non-racial group surveyed who uses the term more than any other.

For those who are educated, with some college, only 4% use the term to describe themselves. Those with a bachelor’s degree or greater, 7% use the term to describe themselves.

Overwhelmingly, over 70%, regardless of specific groups except for lesbian, gay or bisexual participants, say the term should not be used to describe Latinos. The total average contains the 75% referenced earlier.

Given what we know about this study, is Latinx a slur? Judging by this study alone we cannot conclude it is a slur, but we can affirm that most Latinos do not use the term while a third of Hispanics or Latinos who have heard of the term, generally view its use as a bad thing.

A Quick Informal Poll from TikTok: Is Latinx a slur?

Since there are no comprehensive studies on whether 'Latinx' is considered a slur, I’ve conducted a quick, informal poll on TikTok asking two questions that I believe are important for expanding our understanding of how Latinos or Hispanics view the term Latinx. Please note that this is not a scientific poll and should not be interpreted as representative of the broader population.

In this informal poll, there were 68 participants, and I asked two specific questions: “Is the term 'Latinx' considered offensive, insulting, or a mockery of Hispanic or Latino culture?” and “Is 'Latinx' a slur?”

According to my record, 55 participants considered the term ‘Latinx’ offensive, insulting or a mockery of Hispanic or Latino culture. This represents approximately 80.88% of participants. Respectively, 60.29% of participants consider the term a slur. Of those who consider the term offensive, insulting or mocking, 74.55% of them consider it a slur. The informal TikTok poll offers limited insight due to its small sample, but it suggests a significant portion of respondents view "Latinx" negatively, indicating a need for broader research.

During this informal poll, many commenters shared negative views about the term. They suggested that it lacked respect and was problematic in several ways. "Latinx is problematic," was a common theme among commenters. "Don't call me Latinx," was another sentiment expressed by multiple users. After the poll, some users who supported the term expressed that the results were "disappointing."

Latinx: A Failed Attempt at Inclusivity

While the intention behind "Latinx" may have been to promote inclusivity, the data indicates a significant failure in its execution and reception within the Latino community. The term is overwhelmingly rejected by Latinos, rarely used, and for many, carries negative connotations. It highlights the complexities of language evolution, cultural sensitivity, and the potential disconnect between well-intentioned initiatives and their real-world impact on the communities they aim to serve. Instead of unifying, "Latinx" appears to have become a point of contention and division within the Latino community, at least based on current data.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Highlights Gulf of America in Emergency Declaration

With Executive Order 25-13, Florida State, under Governor Ron DeSantis, has officially referenced the Gulf of America (El Golfo de América). This comes after Trump's Executive Order that focuses on highlighting America’s history.

Although Donald Trump has faced some criticism for his stance on the Gulf of America, he has been getting a lot of support from Republicans in the South. Latinos have also expressed their support for Trump as it highlights the connection with Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian explorer who sailed under the Spanish banner. As we know, the United States of America was named after Amerigo Vespucci. The name Gulf of America continues to highlight not just Spanish achievements, but also gives more focus to the American region as a whole.

It seems that the Gulf of America is here to stay!

Donald Trump and Latinos: Opportunities for Impact in his Second Term

Donald Trump has made notable inroads in gaining support for the Republican Party among Latino Americans. Now that he is the President of the United States, I hope to see him implement policies that benefit Latinos and all Americans. Early in his presidency, I was not among his supporters, but he won me over during the COVID era. His focus on issues like cartel violence, the effects of undocumented immigration on housing, reducing regulations for small businesses, and promoting tax cuts resonated deeply with me. As he returns to office, fulfilling these commitments will be critical to meeting the expectations of Latino Americans who supported him.

Shifting the Latino Vote: Cartel Violence and Immigration Policy

Traditionally, Democrats have secured Latino support by emphasizing immigration reform and accusing Republicans of being anti-immigrant. However, Trump’s firm stance against cartel violence has started to shift that narrative. The Democratic Party’s focus on immigration without addressing the root causes, like cartel influence in Latin America, has alienated some Latino voters. Today, we have unprecedented access to information, and many of us witness the brutal atrocities of cartels through our smartphones. This makes the Democrats’ reluctance to take a hard stance against organized crime seem disconnected from reality.

For instance, dismissing Republicans as racist for discussing cartel violence and its links to illegal immigration misses the mark. Trump’s messaging has emphasized eliminating cartel violence and working with Latin American nations, like Perú and El Salvador, to achieve this goal. By addressing the root causes of migration, Trump has an opportunity to slow undocumented immigration effectively, rather than offering temporary fixes like lenient immigration laws.

Housing prices have skyrocketed, creating a nationwide housing crisis, and undocumented immigration has exacerbated the issue. Increasing demand for housing—particularly affordable housing—due to undocumented populations has strained resources for citizens and legal residents. Democrats have avoided addressing this, but Trump can champion a more realistic approach that benefits all Americans.

Supporting Small Businesses and the American Dream

Small business ownership is another area where legal migrants, particularly Latinos, thrive. My father, a migrant from Peru, is a prime example. He built a small business and earned his American citizenship through hard work. Stories like his highlight the importance of creating opportunities for entrepreneurs.

Trump can reignite the American Dream by removing unnecessary fees and simplifying the process of starting a business. The U.S. economy desperately needs rejuvenation, especially after the missteps of Joe Biden’s presidency. While business ownership has grown under Biden, much of that growth can be attributed to the simplified tax code passed during Trump’s first term. By revising the tax code further and streamlining the corporate tax process, Trump could create an unprecedented boom in small business development.

A Need for Permanent and Fair Tax Reform

While Trump’s tax changes benefited corporations, the temporary nature of the personal income tax cuts was a missed opportunity. Moving forward, his proposals to abolish the IRS or eliminate the income tax altogether, though ambitious, would be transformative. A more practical step, however, would be simplifying the tax brackets to three or four, with a maximum marginal rate of 5%. A permanent increase to the standard deduction would especially help low-income families who don’t itemize.

The tax code is overly complicated, and Trump must prioritize its overhaul, ensuring simplicity and fairness for all Americans.

The Path to Success

If Donald Trump secures another term, he has the potential to significantly impact the nation—particularly for Latino Americans. However, he must deliver on his promises to cement their continued support. While he can pressure Congress to act, Americans have little trust in the legislative branch. For Trump to succeed, he must not only push Congress but also inspire bipartisan cooperation to prioritize Americans’ needs over partisan agendas.

For Latinos and Americans alike, we need Donald Trump to succeed. His leadership in tackling issues like cartel violence, undocumented immigration, housing, and small business growth could ensure a brighter future for all. Donald Trump can cement himself as the best president of the 21st century if he can successfully fulfill these expectations.

The Role of Spanish Colonization in Preserving Latin American Indigenous Languages and Cultures

OPINION—It’s always entertaining to hear progressives declare that the Spanish colonized Latin America and obliterated its languages, as if many indigenous cultures uniformly operated with written systems. Most pre-Columbian societies in Latin America were oral societies. This posed inherent challenges to preserving their linguistic and cultural heritage which colonization further impacted the survival and interpretation of these traditions. Modern understanding of surviving pictographs, glyphs, and symbols is therefore inevitably shaped by subjective perspectives.

For societies with writing systems or other forms of physical record-keeping, documentation was greatly facilitated; however, this primarily benefited larger indigenous empires or a few well-organized smaller societies.

Yes, the Spanish engaged in warfare—both with and against indigenous groups—but ironically, their documentation efforts have become an indispensable resource for modern scholarship on pre-Colombian languages and cultures that survived their conquest. Loanwords in Spanish today bear testimony to the rich linguistic communication of indigenous societies, preserved through colonial texts. It’s worth noting that without Spanish record-keeping, we’d have far less insight into the intricate dialects and traditions of these oral societies.

While colonization undoubtedly came with atrocities, including bloody violence and losses of lives and many cultural traditions, blaming the Spanish for failing to preserve what oral societies themselves could not document is a reductive oversimplification that ignores the complexities of history. Oral traditions are invaluable for sharing stories and culture; however, physical record-keeping transcends the limitations of a human lifespan.

We can acknowledge the harms with coercive assimilation and the near-total destruction of indigenous languages and traditions, but we cannot dismiss the cultures and records that have survived or been expanded upon after Spain’s conquest.

Gadsden County: The Latinization of the Black-Majority County In Florida

Gadsden County, Florida, shares a unique perspective, unlike most other places in Florida. As the sole black-majority county in the state, its history intertwined with Spanish expansionism and aggressive American colonization. Its population size hasn’t changed much since the 1960s, with a black population percentage of around 62-66% over thirty years. Yet, as immigration policies falter and as Latinos get more status in the United States, this may drastically change the future of Gadsden County’s reputation as the only black-majority county in Florida. Considering floridanophobia promoted by the media, other ethnic groups are moving to Florida.

Latinos have been in the United States for several hundred years due to the colonization of Spain of the Americas and the mixing of different racial and ethnic groups. Although, in the United States, they weren’t always labeled Latinos or Hispanics. In the context of race, it may be difficult to determine someone’s race within the confines of the American racial system. The systems in place remain incapable of adequately defining, characterizing, or registering Latino and Hispano people. With that said, continuing with its current iteration in the eyes of the United States census, the population of Latinos and Hispanos in Gadsden County is increasing dramatically.

From the 2000 Census to the 2020 Census, the population of Latinos or Hispanos in Florida has almost doubled. Latinos represent 11.6% of the population compared to 6.2% in the 2020 Census for Gadsden County. With the population of Latinos increasing and the population of those who identify as Black or African-American decreasing, it is likely that Gadsden County, Florida, will lose its black-majority title in the next census in 2030. It will be a shift and a culture change for the people in Gadsden County. This may be a concern for black American activists who likely react with blackalgia against other minorities with different perspectives on race.

Intersectional Concepts: Terms of Racial, Ethnic and Cultural Political Activism

This is a glossary for terms and phrases found in intersectional concepts within the United States. These terms may be used in academia, protologisms, or neologisms in the United States, especially in politically active communities, that emphasize sociological issues. The Americano Social Dictionary of Racial, Ethnic and Cultural Identity, A dictionary by Luis Albert Rosales.

Defining the Terms and Phrases

Below you will find definitions for these terms and phrases. 

black fragility

noun

1. the defensive behavior of black people when confronted by opposing discussions and arguments about racial identities and racial dynamics outside of the Black American experience, especially in moments where they feel vulnerable, marginalized, or invalidated by other ethnic minorities of a similar or the same race.

Example: "Black fragility is common when non-American minorities discuss racial matters with black people who are blinded by blackness." (1)

blackalgia

noun

1. the strong reactionary, defensive, or sensitive response within the black American community under pressure when discussing racial dynamics, typically stemming from Black fragility.

Example: "When discussing racial issues involving dark-skinned Latinos, some black Americans exhibit signs of blackalgia." (1)

floridanismo

noun

1. a word or expression from the dialects of Spanish spoken in Florida.

2. a vocation or calling toward the Floridano world, its culture, and its organization.

3. love for or attachment to what is Floridano.

4. a sociopolitical movement promoting a unified Latino-centered Floridano identity in Florida through cultural cohesion, multilingual integration, and regional economic and political collaboration.

Example:"Telling Hispanos to fear Republicans in Florida is floridanophobia and ironic." (1)

floridanophobia

noun

1. the fear, distrust, hatred of, aversion to, or discrimination against Floridanos or their culture.

Example:"Telling Hispanos to fear Republicans in Florida is floridanophobia and ironic." (1)

lodisucio

noun

1. a non-Hispanic Black American who claims that Black people are the original indigenous inhabitants of the Americas, the sole owners, creators or primary builders of American culture and history, and who claims inherent superiority over non-Black people while prioritizing Black identity and culture.

racial-cultural exclusivity

noun

1. a social phenomenon where racial groups create exclusive environments or communities that prioritize their cultural traditions, beliefs, and practices, while deliberately excluding others who are not of the same race.

2. a belief that certain racial or cultural groups should maintain distinct social, cultural, or geographic separation from others, often to preserve unique cultural identities or perceived racial purity.

Example: “Black Americans practice racial-cultural exclusivity when they say white people cannot say certain words, wear certain clothes or hairstyles because they are not black.” (2)

Define Latinx | What is Latinx? | ¿Qué es latinx?

 

Latinx (noun)

1. a person descended from or originating in Latin America who rejects Latin American cultures and their gender norms, particularly the grammatical gender conventions of the Spanish language. 

2. used as a contemptuous term for a Latin person.

Notes:

Latinx is not commonly used outside fringe progressive circles in the United States. Originally, the word was intended to represent a non-binary term for Latinos. If used outside of progressive American circles, most Hispanics and other Latinos have expressed their opposition to the term; ensuring a deep mistrust stemming from the term itself. There is no unified pronunciation of the term 'Latinx' in Spanish, complicating its adoptance.

For a deeper cultural analysis of Latinx, please read our thesis. 

TikTok, Seemingly, Suppresses Latino Conservative Creators!

This article is an observation of my findings digging into TikTok's anti-Latino bias; We'll be discussing how TikTok manipulates and suppresses videos with a certain hashtag in the Latino community. TikTok has gotten the attention of many youthful users, but it seems that the development team may allegedly be silencing Latino creators who use the hashtag '#Latino'. This comes from something that I found when I was making a video on TikTok about Latinos and Latinx.

On TikTok, you can add a caption when you finish recording and editing a video. The caption box allows you to use hashtags and lists the number of posts that that hashtag has garnered within an unspecified time. However, when I use the hashtag 'Latino', it reveals to me that there are "0 posts" when I regularly use the hashtag. Compared to the other variations of Latino and the insulting term, Latinx, they all are registered and have a post count. Now, this coincides with something else I found interesting.

When I use the hashtag "Latino" in any of my videos, those videos get significantly fewer viewers than the others. I've noticed this on multiple previous accounts that were banned by TikTok's pro-censorship community guideline moderators that clearly have an anti-Latino and an anti-Catholic or Christian bias; these accounts include LuchiCholito and Esecholito. To add, when I don't use the hashtag Latino, but use any other Latino-related hashtag, the videos perform much better by a ratio of 3:1 to 5:1 views. 

I will continue to observe these seemingly deliberate acts to suppress Latino and Latino conservatives. What do you think about my findings regarding this troublesome ordeal? Should TikTok publicly announce why they have #Latino at zero posts and why people who use the hashtag #Latino are being suppressed?

Donald Trump Has BIG Rally in South Bronx as Democrat Support For Joe Biden Wanes

Donald Trump has been having a tough few months with multiple lawsuits but he remains unbothered as he is quickly becoming the people's favorite. The fatigue has set in and the people may be tired of the political games that Republicans call a witchhunt. Amid his legal troubles, Donald Trump conducted a rally on May 23rd, at around 6PM Eastern Time which has a strong showing in South Bronx, New York.

Donald Trump has been making his rounds throughout New York to spend time with the people. Moments where he attempted to meet with a bodega owner who had to end someone's life as a result of an assault, electrified some Latinos. Latinos have had a rocky ride with Joe Biden with the onslaught of words like "Latinx" coming into the fray.  Now he comes with a rally in New York, speaking to the people about the issues plaguing the United States.

On Rumble, in the Right Side Broadcasting Network's live stream of the rally, the views of the live stream reached well around 130,000 viewers. At this writing, the stream has gotten a total view count of over 450,000 views. They re-uploaded the full Donald Trump South Bronx Rally for clear viewing.

Although a modest amount, this is one of the largest streams that Rumble has had and it serves as an example that Donald Trump can effectively gather many groups of people to watch him on alternative platforms—platforms that may be preferable to those that may be viewed as corrupt or more favorable to Democrats. 

What Is Latinx? The Linguistic Complexity of 'Latinx': A Battle Between Cultural Tradition vs Cultural Subversion for 'Progress'

What is Latinx? The term "Latinx" has garnered considerable attention, in recent years, especially within progressive circles in the United States. Its advocates argue that it represents a more inclusive and gender-neutral alternative to the traditional "Latino" or "Latina." However, a closer examination of the term reveals a complex linguistic and cultural conundrum, raising questions about its appropriateness and relevance within the Latin American and Hispanic communities.

The Linguistic Conundrum with Epicenity

The primary argument put forth by proponents of "Latinx" is that it rectifies the gender bias inherent in the Spanish language. They contend that the "o" in "Latino" is inherently masculine and excludes non-binary and transgender individuals. However, this argument overlooks a fundamental linguistic concept known as epicenity, which allows Spanish nouns to adapt their gender based on context.

Epicenity, a crucial concept in Spanish linguistics, allows nouns to acquire masculine and feminine connotations depending on the context. For instance, the word "persona," which may appear feminine, can take on a masculine form, "el persona," when referring to a male individual. In essence, "Latino" already encompasses all Latin American people, irrespective of gender.

The Unexplored Neutralization Of Other Spanish Words

While proponents of "Latinx" emphasize the need for gender-neutral language, they have not considered the existence of Spanish terms such as "genero" (gender) and "no-binario" (non-binary). These words inherently end with "o" due to the gendered nature of the Spanish language, yet the proponents have not promoted the use of "generx" or "no-binarx." This inconsistency raises questions about the logical coherence of their argument.

How Do You Pronounce Latinx?

One particularly challenging aspect of "Latinx" is its pronunciation and practical usage within the Spanish language. How does one pronounce "Latinx" in Spanish, and how can it be used naturally in a sentence when referring to a specific individual? These questions remain unanswered, highlighting the impracticality of imposing non-binary language within a language structured around binary gender distinctions.

Progressive Elitism and Cultural Protectionism

The paradox arises when examining the progressive ideals behind promotions of "Latinx." Progressives advocate for cultural sensitivity and the respect of minority cultures. However, pushing a term that rejects the linguistic structure of the Latin American and, especially,  Hispanic communities seems contradictory. It raises the question of whether progressive Democrats truly speak for the Latino community and the skepticism on how valuable their information is regarding Latino culture.

In their pursuit of inclusivity and gender neutrality, the term "Latinx" has been touted as a solution. However, a deeper analysis reveals its failure to align with the linguistic intricacies of the Spanish language or the cultural nuances of the Latin American and Hispanic communities. While promoting inclusivity is a noble endeavor, it is essential to consider the linguistic and cultural contexts in which these changes are proposed. In the case of "Latinx," apparently the term's proponents may need to reevaluate their approach to ensure that it genuinely respects and reflects the diverse cultures it seeks to represent.

In conclusion to these observations, we have provided a proper 21st-century definition for Latinx.